MAC 10s failure is deemed to be the various export laws and legal issues that were imposed on it whereas Uzi was successful because of its intelligent design and safety measures kept in mind while designing. Another reason for MAC 10s failure is that it required special training and safety while using it for it fired too many rounds in too less time.
However, MAC 10 weighs only 2. A crucial difference between MAC 10 and Uzi is that MAC 10 is mm when its stock is removed, mm with stock retracted and mm with stock extended whereas Uzi is mm when stock extended and mm when stock is collapsed. Skip to content MAC 10 and Uzi are both stamp-steel welded submachine guns that are heavily used by military all over the world.
What is MAC 10? What is Uzi? Another key difference is that MAC 10 weighs only 2. MAC 10 has the advantage of a sound suppressor muzzle with a blow-back operation design while Uzi has an open-bolt blow-backs operation which helps keep the firearm cool while firing multiple shots.
By contrast, the M will tuck into a daypack, gym bag, or briefcase without difficulty. Given their external similarity, it was inevitable that there might arise some confusion between the weapons, particularly among the uninitiated. However, in practical usage, these guns sport entirely different personalities.
The Uzi runs at around rounds per minute. By contrast, the M cycles at upwards of 1, rounds per minute and demands close attention to technique for safe operation. Had the M been selected as the replacement for the pistol in American military service the mind boggles at the number of fingers that would have been inadvertently shot away on military firing ranges around the world. While the architecture of the guns was important, the biggest differentiator was the disparate rates of fire.
The Uzi saved a nation and equipped militaries, police forces, and thugs of various stripes around the planet. It remains in production today and is an international icon. The M had its moment in the sun but sputtered and died in relatively short order. Despite a niche following among American civilian shooters, it is doubtful whether the M is in active service anywhere in the world today. While marketing, legislation, and export laws came into play, the primary reason one gun thrived while the other failed is that the smaller of the two just shoots too fast.
Uzi M Dabbs, I noticed that none of your photos of the Ingram submachine guns show the muzzle strap, or even the washer it clipped on to, which was part of the original design. That muzzle strap was intended to be used as a foregrip, which helped keep the bullets going closer to the target and keep fingers from straying too close to the muzzle. I wish to relate what I have learned about both of them, from past shooting experience, as well as working as a volunteer at the Head Weapons Identification Laboratory of the Israeli National Police in Jerusalem.
The full size Uzi as pictured in the article, was the end design of a long evolution, from Mr. The original, like some other open bolt SMG designs, was prone to accidentally firing, if dropped, with the muzzle up, causing the bolt to move far enough to the rear, with inertia, to chamber a round and fire it, but not far enough back to be held by the sear mechanism.
These and other improvements were the result of work by various members of the IMI design team, which improved Mr. I have not fired, but have been told that the Micro Uzi, which is much closer to the size of the MAC, does not have the reliability of the Mini Uzi. Some real tragedies have occurred when adults gave children Mini Uzis to fire.
In recent years, with the advent of plastic framed pistols, liability conscious ammo companies have vastly changed the pressure peak curves, of particularly 9x19mm ammo, resulting in much ammo that will NOT reliably function a full size UZI, or many other older SMGs, designed for the older spec ammo. Older Israeli military production, with convex primers, has relatively insensitive primers.
So the full size Uzi has an exceptional primer strike reliability as a result. I prefer the. Thanks again to Mr. Dabbs for an interesting article and good photos. This was a great article. I personally do not like open bolt sub machine guns. The more modern Uzis have some closed bolt designs which I think are great.
I have a semi automatic 9 millimeter Luger carbine that I love to shoot. It has twenty round magazines. I am an effective shooter with it to about 65 yards. Honestly I really love M. It is a simple gun that fires smoothly. While I liked it a lot, I only had 50 rounds to shoot, so my pleasure was short.
One of my buddies, a police officer, came running in one night, pulled me aside and showed me his new toy. It had arrived that day. We fired a few boxes of ammo after the store closed, then back to my house. He called over a few friends, and we began reloading 45 ACP till late at night.
The next morning, we went to an outdoor place to shoot. We fired hundreds of rounds, picked up the brass, and were gone in half an hour. Other friends, also police, had various full auto guns.
We shot them all, but my favorite was the UZI. A full auto Thompson Mod. But bear in mind, I have never liked or owned a 9 mm. The M. The M12 in. In I bought an original Military Armament Corp. M in. Targo, McClane incapacitates him and takes the MAC gun from the dead henchman and proceed above the ship. He proceed to the bridge while carrying the MAC with him. When he sees no one there, he checks on the radio to the Coast Guard about the ship.
As the ship was tracing the signal, McClane sees the real pounds of liquid explosives on the ship and realized that the bomb in the school was not real. Die Hard Wiki Explore. World of Die Hard.
0コメント